Key Takeaways
- Department websites serve prospective students, current students, faculty, and researchers with different needs
- Stakeholder alignment before design prevents costly revisions later
- Templates provide consistency but need flexibility for departmental differences
- Content strategy matters more than visual design for department sites
- Plan for ongoing maintenance, not just launch
The Department Website Challenge
Academic departments are strange organizational units. They're semi-autonomous entities within a larger institution, serving multiple audiences who want very different things. A chemistry department website needs to recruit prospective students, support current students, showcase faculty research, and serve the broader academic community—often with limited resources and inconsistent content governance.
Redesigning these sites requires balancing competing interests while maintaining institutional brand coherence. Get it wrong, and you end up with either a cookie-cutter site that doesn't serve the department's needs or a rogue site that confuses users expecting university consistency.
The Core Tension
Departments want to stand out (for recruitment and prestige). Institutions want consistency (for brand and maintenance). Successful redesigns honor both needs rather than sacrificing one for the other.
Understanding Your Audiences
Department sites serve distinctly different user groups:
Prospective Students
What they want:
- Clear program information (degrees, requirements, outcomes)
- Evidence of student success (careers, graduate school placement)
- Faculty expertise and approachability
- Research and experiential opportunities
- Campus life and department culture
- How to apply and what to expect
Current Students
What they need:
- Course schedules and registration information
- Advising contacts and procedures
- Forms, policies, and deadlines
- Internship and job opportunities
- Research assistant positions
- Student organization information
Faculty and Researchers
What they look for:
- Research group information
- Publication and grant information
- Collaboration opportunities
- Lab and facility information
- Conference and seminar schedules
The Prioritization Decision
You can't optimize equally for all audiences. Most department sites should prioritize:
- Prospective students (enrollment impact)
- Current students (service obligation)
- External researchers (reputation/recruitment)
- Internal faculty (they have other channels)
The Faculty Trap
Content Strategy First
Design follows content, not the other way around. Before any visual design:
Content Audit
Assess what exists:
- Inventory all current pages and content types
- Identify high-traffic pages (analytics data)
- Flag outdated content (look for old dates, broken links)
- Note content that exists elsewhere (main site, LMS, catalog)
- Identify gaps (what's missing that users need)
Essential Content Types
Most department sites need:
- Program pages: Degree descriptions, requirements, outcomes
- Faculty directory: Profiles, research interests, contact info
- Course information: Descriptions, schedules, or links to catalog
- Research highlights: Labs, projects, publications
- Student resources: Forms, advising, opportunities
- News/events: Department happenings (if maintained)
- Contact/location: How to reach the department
Content Governance
Decide before launch:
- Who creates new content?
- Who approves content changes?
- Who maintains ongoing accuracy?
- What content review schedule exists?
- What happens when someone leaves?
The News Section Graveyard
Information Architecture
How content is organized determines whether users find what they need:
Common Navigation Patterns
-
Audience-based
Organize by user type (Prospective Students, Current Students, Faculty, etc.). Clear but can lead to duplicate content.
-
Topic-based
Organize by subject (Programs, Research, People, Resources). More common and usually works well.
-
Hybrid
Topic-based primary navigation with audience pathways highlighted on homepage or landing pages.
Recommended Structure
A typical effective structure:
- About: Department overview, mission, history, facilities
- Programs: Degrees, minors, certificates, requirements
- People: Faculty, staff, graduate students
- Research: Labs, projects, publications, resources
- Students: Resources, advising, opportunities, organizations
- News & Events: If actively maintained
- Contact: Location, hours, key contacts
Homepage Strategy
The homepage should:
- Immediately communicate what the department does
- Highlight what makes this department distinctive
- Provide clear paths to major content areas
- Feature dynamic content if regularly updated (news, events)
- Include calls to action for prospective students
Homepage Do's
Clear value proposition. Quick links to popular content. Visual research/program highlights. Obvious path to application info. Mobile-friendly layout.
Homepage Don'ts
Dense text walls. Auto-playing videos. Outdated news items. Faculty-focused content. Complex navigation. Hidden contact information.
Faculty Profiles Done Right
Faculty profiles are crucial for recruitment and research visibility:
Essential Profile Elements
- Professional photo (consistent style across department)
- Title and contact information
- Research interests (in accessible language)
- Teaching areas
- Education and credentials
- Selected publications or portfolio
- Lab/research group affiliation
Profile Maintenance Challenge
Faculty profiles are notoriously hard to keep current:
- Create simple update process (form, not CMS access)
- Schedule annual review reminders
- Pull publication data from institutional repository if possible
- Accept that some profiles will be incomplete
What Prospective Students Want
Research shows students care about:
- Research they could be involved in
- Faculty approachability (photos matter)
- Teaching quality indicators
- Mentorship availability
The CV Trap
Faculty often want their full CV published. This serves their needs but not prospective students who don't care about a 1998 conference presentation. Highlight recent, relevant work and link to full CV for those who want it.
Template vs. Custom Approach
Most institutions use templates for department sites. Here's how to make them work:
Template Benefits
- Brand consistency across departments
- Reduced development and maintenance costs
- Easier content migration and updates
- Shared improvements benefit all departments
- Simpler training for content editors
Template Limitations
- May not accommodate unique content types
- Departments feel constrained
- One-size-fits-all rarely fits all
- Limited ability to highlight distinctiveness
Flexible Template Design
Good templates include:
- Configurable homepage layouts
- Multiple content block options
- Department-specific color accents (within brand)
- Optional sections that can be enabled/disabled
- Ability to add custom pages for unique needs
| Aspect | Rigid Template | Flexible Template | Full Custom |
|---|---|---|---|
| Development cost | Low | Medium | High |
| Maintenance cost | Low | Medium | High |
| Brand consistency | High | High | Variable |
| Department fit | Poor | Good | Excellent |
| Scalability | Excellent | Good | Poor |
The Redesign Process
A structured approach prevents common pitfalls:
-
Discovery and stakeholder alignment
Gather requirements from all stakeholder groups. Align on goals, priorities, and constraints before any design work begins.
-
Content audit and strategy
Inventory existing content. Identify what to keep, update, merge, or retire. Define content governance.
-
Information architecture
Design site structure and navigation. Test with card sorting or tree testing with actual users.
-
Wireframes and prototypes
Create low-fidelity layouts before visual design. Focus on content priority and user flows.
-
Visual design
Apply brand standards to approved wireframes. Define department-specific elements within brand guidelines.
-
Content creation and migration
Write new content. Migrate and update existing content. This takes longer than expected—plan accordingly.
-
Development and testing
Build the site. Test functionality, accessibility, and performance. User acceptance testing with stakeholders.
-
Launch and training
Deploy the site. Train content editors. Establish ongoing maintenance processes.
-
Post-launch optimization
Monitor analytics. Gather feedback. Make iterative improvements.
The Content Migration Black Hole
Measuring Success
Define success metrics before launch:
Recruitment Metrics
- Application requests from site visitors
- Information request form submissions
- Program page engagement (time on page, scroll depth)
- Traffic from prospective student sources
User Experience Metrics
- Bounce rate on key pages
- Task completion rates (if measurable)
- Internal search queries (indicating navigation issues)
- Exit pages (where users leave)
Content Health Metrics
- Content freshness (last updated dates)
- Broken link counts
- Page views by content section
- Content editor activity
Making It Stick
A redesign is only successful if the site stays useful over time:
- Train multiple content editors: Don't create single points of failure
- Document content standards: What voice, what length, what formatting
- Schedule regular reviews: Quarterly content audits prevent decay
- Establish update triggers: New faculty, program changes, etc.
- Plan for iteration: Launch isn't the end; it's the beginning
The best department websites aren't the flashiest—they're the ones that consistently serve users with accurate, current information. Invest in sustainability, not just launch.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much should department sites differ from the main university site?
Who should be involved in a department website redesign?
How often should department websites be redesigned?
Should each department have its own website or use a template?
Planning a department website redesign?
I help universities redesign department websites that serve students effectively while meeting institutional standards. Let's discuss your project and develop a strategic approach.